- #HOW TO INSTALL MICROSOFT.MSHTML ASSEMBLY FULL#
- #HOW TO INSTALL MICROSOFT.MSHTML ASSEMBLY CODE#
- #HOW TO INSTALL MICROSOFT.MSHTML ASSEMBLY WINDOWS 7#
# Initialize Array to hold assemblies to attempt to load $CSVLocation = " $Env:USERPROFILE\Add_Type_Lookup.csv "
![How To Install Microsoft.Mshtml Assembly How To Install Microsoft.Mshtml Assembly](https://www.lifewire.com/thmb/8M7y8CPw4aPyqw47DaLSAfELfak=/533x300/smart/filters:no_upscale()/mshtml-dll-error-message-5a6891bcfa6bcc00365f3a46.png)
![How To Install Microsoft.Mshtml Assembly How To Install Microsoft.Mshtml Assembly](https://i.stack.imgur.com/tz2Ws.jpg)
Follow Me on Twitter # Best to Start this in a powershell.exe -noprofile session Husband of a magnificent woman, father of 5, SQL Server geek, IndyPASS Vice President and Food Guy, DBA automation zealot, amateur Powershell evangelist.
#HOW TO INSTALL MICROSOFT.MSHTML ASSEMBLY FULL#
I do not believe this list to be comprehensive, but I do think it is safe to say that anything on this list reflects the accurate full name that Add-Type will resolve to if you provide a partial name. Of those, I was able to determine that 308 of them are in the Add-Type list. On my machine, it attempted to load 1073 assemblies (took a while). I understand, this is a very resource intensive approach, but there is little other choice that I could find that would tell me what versions the cmdlet would be loading for any given assembly. These will throw a custom error of ASSEMBLY_NOT_FOUND which means that the lookup failed. There are several assemblies that Add-Type does not seem to have a reference for. Technically, Add-Type has that assembly in its list, so we can take the information out of the exception and know what the full assembly name was and store that value. If the assembly could not be loaded because the short name references an assembly that just doesn’t exist. If the cmdlet fails, the type of failure is recorded. If the cmdlet loads the assembly, the current assembly list is examined to determine the full name of the assembly that was loaded. The script below will take all of the assembly names that it can find and throw them at the Add-Type cmdlet. I decided to take this known list of assemblies and toss it to Add-Type and see what fell out.
#HOW TO INSTALL MICROSOFT.MSHTML ASSEMBLY WINDOWS 7#
After spending some intimate time Bingling, trying to hit up methods and properties of the AddTypeCommand class, and otherwise coming up empty handed, I decided to take an alternate approach.Īll the assemblies that I currently care to load for my work will be stored in one of the six folders of the GAC (Global Assembly Cache) on my Windows 7 Workstation. I spent some time with ProcessMonitor trying to determine if it was getting it from the registry or possibly from a different DLL with no luck. While this makes some sense, neither of these statements is clear exactly from what list this pulls from. To quote “Microsoft” in the comment “The list is hard coded so that anybody writing “Add-Type –Assembly ” gets the same version.” In a similar vein, the documentation for Add-Type states that if “you enter a simple or partial name, Add-Type resolves it to the full name, and then uses the full name to load the assembly”. The system cannot find the file specified.Ī quick Bing search found an interesting Connect posting that offered some explanation. PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91' or one of its dependencies. To my surprise, it failed with the following error: Add-Type : Could not load file or assembly ', Version=9.0.242.0, Culture=neutral, When I checked what version of the assembly that had loaded, I realized that it had chosen the 2005 version? I thought, great, this does the opposite of LoadWithPartialName and loads the oldest… So, I tried it on box that did not have the 2005 client installed.
![How To Install Microsoft.Mshtml Assembly How To Install Microsoft.Mshtml Assembly](https://securityonline.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/js.png)
#HOW TO INSTALL MICROSOFT.MSHTML ASSEMBLY CODE#
I used the following code on my workstation and attempted to load the SMO assembly and it worked just fine. I wanted more control, so started to switch from LoadWithPartialName to Add-Type. So, if you have SQL 2005, 2008, and 2012, you’ll get the 2012 versions regardless. Not only is it obsolete, it doesn’t allow you to choose which version of the SMO library you want to load and always loads the most recent. Through this process, I’ve come to understand why “::LoadWithPartialName” is not a good option in PowerShell. I’ve been working a lot lately with SMO and the differences between the various versions between SQL 2005, 2008, and 2012.